No Child Left Behind

Friday July 22, 2022

No Child Left Behind

|
January 26, 2017

Review the impact, Prepare a brief paper synthesizing federal, state, and local legislation and/or regulations regarding the school safety related points (Unsafe School Option) in No Child Left Behind(“the previous version of the law, the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, was enacted in 2002. NCLB represented a significant step forward for our nation’s children in many respects, particularly as it shined a light on where students were making progress and where they needed additional support, regardless of race, income, zip code, disability, home language, or background. The law was scheduled for revision in 2007, and, over time, NCLB’s prescriptive requirements became increasingly unworkable for schools and educators. Recognizing this fact, in 2010, the Obama administration joined a call from educators and families to create a better law that focused on the clear goal of fully preparing all students for success in college and careers. The previous version of the law, the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act.” The previous version of the law, the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, was enacted in 2002.
Summarize the review by offering an opinion about “why” our nation moved in the direction required by No Child Left Behind and how “persistently dangerous schools” can be mitigated.

Prepare a brief paper synthesizing federal, state, and local legislation and/or regulations
The paper should reflect that you:
•Reviewed three websites related to ESSA and provide a brief paragraph explaining the act and update from NCLB.
•description of each web site and school safety related points in the federal regulation.
•Identified two primary state statutes that relate to school safety issues and persistently dangerous schools. Refer to your home state for this part of the activity.
•Reviewed local school board rules regarding safety and security that may have been inspired by issues as indicated in ESSA. Refer to your home school district for this part of the activity.

Websites: Florida:  http://www.fldoe.org/academics/essa.stml

Pennsylvania: http://www.epasd.org/Page/4276
Approved Standards for Persistently Dangerous Schools for the Pennsylvania Department of Education, as required by the Unsafe School Choice Option provision of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Section 9532). At: http://www.epasd.org/Page/4276

Montana:
Approved Standards for Persistently Dangerous Schools for the Montana Department of Education, as required by the Unsafe School Choice Option provision of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Section 9532). At: http://opi.mt.gov/pdf/SchoolDiscipline/16SD_Manual.pdf

California: http://www.cde.ca.gov/ls/ss/se/uscoattch2.asp

Get a
10 % discount on an order above
$ 100

Use the following coupon code :

CHECK ORDER PAGE

Category: Law


Get a custom answer for this and any question related to academic

Order Now
Order a Custom Paper
By placing an order, you agree to our terms & conditions