Impact of Marbury v Madison on the American Judicial System

Thursday July 28, 2022

Identify Professor Course Date The Influence of Marbury v Madison on the American Judicial System The Marbury v Madison case is known for increasing the facility of judicial overview. In a unanimous choice, the judges dominated that the US Supreme Court docket had the facility to overview legal guidelines handed by Congress to find out their constitutionality. The ruling implied that the judiciary had the facility to declare a legislation handed by the legislature unconstitutional. Accordingly, the case established a system of checks and balances as a result of the judiciary may additionally rule on the actions of the manager. Moreover, the facility of the judiciary has prolonged lately to cowl the actions of state and native jurisdictions. Historians have hailed the Marbury v Madison case because the final and crowning development of American civilization. Though Marbury v Madison has the optimistic results of creating the doctrines of checks and balances and separation of energy, the case has additionally led to damaging results together with irregular modifications on the structure and the judiciary utilizing judicial overview to intrude with the facility of the legislature to formulate public coverage. Background of the Marbury v Madison Case In 1803, the US Supreme Court docket declared that the judiciary had the facility and authority to overview legal guidelines and legislative acts by Congress to find out their compliance with the structure. The case originated from the 1800 U.S presidential elections (Gluck 63). Thomas Jefferson contested in opposition to John Adams and received the elections. Nevertheless, earlier than Jefferson may assume workplace, John Adams and his occasion handed the Judiciary Act of 1789, which gave the president extra management and energy within the appointment of judicial officers. Right here, the Judiciary Act of 1789 created the positions of justices of peace and sixteen new judges (Gluck 63). Nevertheless, there was a delay in validating the brand new positions and William Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court docket to compel James Madison to ship the paperwork of fee. Marbury had been appointed as a justice of peace within the District of Columbia whereas Madison was the Secretary of State within the new administration. The courtroom declared the actions by Madison as unlawful however didn’t compel him handy over the paperwork of fee for 2 causes. First, the courtroom dominated that the supply of the Judiciary Act of 1789 permitting Marbury to deliver the case earlier than the Supreme Court docket was unconstitutional (Gluck 65). The case was past the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court docket, which made it unimaginable for the judges to make a ruling. Second, Congress didn’t have the facility to alter the structure by way of common laws as a result of the Structure is superior to any legal guidelines. Due to this fact, the Supreme Court docket declared the Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional. Optimistic Impacts It could be onerous to think about that the choice in Marbury v Madison reworked the American judicial system for the higher, however the truth is, the judicial system has by no means been the identical once more. To start with, Marbury v Madison established the precept of checks and balances in authorities. The remark that folks typically search to build up extra energy and affect shaped the premise of the doctrine of checks and balances. For the primary time within the historical past of the US, a courtroom declared an act of Congress as unconstitutional. The choice by Congress to enact the Judiciary Act of 1789 is an instance of certainly one of authorities changing into too highly effective (Moskowitz 24). The choice by the Supreme Court docket, alternatively, was an instance of 1 arm of the federal government guaranteeing that one other arm is complying with the structure. Right here, the Supreme Court docket affirmed its place because the Structure’s chief interpreter. Due to this fact, the judiciary reined a few of its authority to make sure that actions of the legislature didn’t violate the structure even when it associated to the formation of legal guidelines as a result of the Superior Clause provides precedence to the structure over any legal guidelines. Along with the doctrine of checks and balances, Marbury v Madison promoted the doctrine of separation of powers. There are three buildings of the federal government, together with the legislature, government and judiciary. Every of those arms of the federal government has distinct powers which are separate however complementary to one another (Moskowitz 25). Right here, the framers of the structure paired the doctrine of separation of powers with the doctrine of checks and balances to make sure that not one of the arms of presidency exceeded their powers (Perlin 200). Marbury v Madison established the facility of the judiciary to overview the acts of Congress and the legislative arm of presidency. In reality, the case demonstrated that the judiciary may declare the acts of the opposite arms of presidency as unconstitutional with out making a constitutional disaster (Moskowitz 25). Curiously, the Supreme Court docket confirmed that the judiciary derived a few of its powers from Congress and will rein on a few of its authority to realize separation of powers. Due to this fact, Marbury v Madison demonstrated that the judiciary derived a few of its powers from Congress, nevertheless it acts independently from the affect of the opposite arms of presidency by retaining the authority over the interpretation of the structure. Adverse Impacts The Marbury v Madison case additionally had damaging impacts on the American judicial system. One of many damaging impacts of the case is that courts have been empowered to make irregular modifications to the structure, which is the very best type of political irresponsibility. Although the widespread argument has been that the case protected the integrity of the structure, the fact is that the structure is now not the supreme legislation of the land. As a substitute, the interpretation of the structure relies on the structure of the Supreme Court docket (Perlin 201). As an illustration, liberal judges dominated the US Supreme Court docket through the 1930s by way of the 1960s. Consequently, there was an enlargement in particular person rights, and democracy flourished (Gluck 64). For the reason that 1970s, nevertheless, conservative judges dominated the Supreme Court docket, and this led to the courtroom limiting the enlargement of many rights (Gluck 65). The 2 examples display that the interpretation of the structure relies on the temperament of the judges occupying the Supreme Court docket slightly than its language. That is harmful as a result of the judiciary has turn into dictatorial and is limiting the powers of the opposite arms of presidency due to the shortage of accountability by the courts. The opposite damaging affect of Marbury v Madison has been a shift within the energy to find out public coverage from the legislature to the judiciary, which violates the doctrine of separation of powers. The judiciary has the authority to guard the structure. Sadly, the case gave the judiciary the powers to introduce constitutional modifications that negatively have an effect on coverage formulation (Lincoln, Theodore, Carl, Joseph, and Francis 100). As an illustration, President Donald Trump can’t cast off Obama care even when it doesn’t meet the wants of the People until by way of a brand new legislation or an modification. The instance demonstrates that courts have turn into political by exercising authority over public insurance policies on the expense of changing into a purely judicial establishment. Summarily, Marbury v Madison has an everlasting legacy within the historical past of the US, although it’s each optimistic and damaging. On the one hand, the case confirmed the facility of judiciary to train judicial overview, which protects the integrity of the structure by selling the doctrines of separation of energy and checks and balances. Alternatively, judicial overview has restricted the accountability of the courts to the manager and legislative branches of presidency. As well as, judicial overview has led to the judiciary changing into political when exercising its authority over public coverage. All in all, it’s evident that Marbury v Madison strengthened the American judicial system. Works Cited Gluck, Abbe. “Imperfect Statutes, Imperfect Courts: Understanding Congress’s Plan within the Period of Unorthodox Lawmaking.” Harvard Regulation Overview, vol. 129, no. 1, 2015, pp. 62–111. Lincoln, Abraham, Theodore Roosevelt, Carl Schurz, Joseph Choate, and Francis F. Browne. Lincoln (Vol. 1-7): Biographies, Speeches and Debates, Civil Struggle Telegrams, Letters, Presidential Orders & Proclamations. E-artnow, 2018. Moskowitz, Daniel. “Why Marbury Issues.” American Historical past, vol. 52, no. four, 2017, pp. 24–25. Perlin, Debra. “Marbury on the Thames: Separation of Powers in the UK’s Nascent Supreme Court docket.” North Carolina Journal of Worldwide

Get a custom answer for this and any question related to academic

Order Now
Order a Custom Paper
By placing an order, you agree to our terms & conditions